The question of who can supervise a learner driver, and in what kind of vehicle, is one that is fraught with difficulties and pitfalls.
As I understood it to supervise a learner in any category a Supervising Driver must: be at least 21 years old; have a full driving licence (for the type of vehicle being used – manual or automatic); have held that valid licence for a minimum of three years; ensure the car is in a safe and legal condition; and meet the minimum eyesight standards.
However, it seems that – and not for the first time – I was wrong, and I have received the following statement from the DVSA.
The Driving and Motorcycle Riding Instructors (Recognition of European Professional Qualifications) Regulations 2016 enables instructors from other member states to have their instructor qualification recognised.
They will have originally qualified under their own member state’s domestic arrangements, which may not necessarily include a requirement to have held the Category B entitlement for three years, as we do.
The provisions in the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 which permit a provisional licence holder to drive under the supervision of a driving instructor (or a qualified driver) could mean that an ADI (who qualified elsewhere in Europe) supervising a B+E provisional licence holder might do so without necessarily having held that entitlement themselves for three years – the fact that they are an ADI enables them to do so.
Because of ensuring equivalence, ADIs who have qualified under GB arrangements can also supervise B+E on the strength of them holding the licence entitlement and being an ADI, although they have not necessarily met the three years driving experience requirement that is necessary as a ‘qualified driver’.
Our interpretation is that the skills they have already demonstrated to become an ADI and their ability to identify hazards more quickly than the ordinary motorist and to take control of a potentially developing situation would mitigate any risk that might otherwise be present if the driver was supervised by someone who had not fulfilled the three years driving experience.
This could also apply to other categories, including C and D, though we would expect numbers meeting both criteria to be small. This change in regulation has brought about the introduction of new ADI badge for instructors who wish to work in the UK on a temporary basis.
So, this is another area ADIs can work in if they are interested and – from a health and safety point of view do know what is required for a B+E test and how to teach it.
Any idea if this would apply to motorcycle training ie an ADI who hasnt held entitlement for three years could if holding full licence train before the three year is up
Hi Vic
I have checked with DVSA and these Regulations do not apply to motorcycle training.
Hi John,
as an ADI who passed his C & C+E tests in 2017 (and has been driving them regularly since then), who considers himself competent as a driver in those categories, this interests me greatly!
I have searched as best I can through the Regulations named in your article, but am struggling to pick out the specific sections that would defend me, if I were to choose to instruct in a category I’ve held for <3 years. Can you assist?
Many thanks, Nick
Hi Nick
Thanks for writing.
You will not find a specific section in the regulations that grants extra rights to GB ADIs. As I said in the blog this change has come about as a result of consequential changes linked to the recognition of European Professional Qualifications.
The UK as a result of EU regulations allows instructors qualified elsewhere in the EU to instruct in GB. They may not have a time specific entitlement to instruct in a particular category, as a consequence it would be unfair to require a time restraint on GB instructors.
If you are concerned as to the legitimacy of you instructing in category C I suggest you write to the ADI Registrar to seek clarification of your rights.
Regards
John
Thank you for a speedy response John, and thank you for clarifying the advice.
Given that I’ve no immediate plans to instruct categories other than that which I’m certain I’m entitled to supervise, it’s likely to be a hypothetical enquiry (in my case).
I still think it’s a meaningful enquiry, and even once 3-years have elapsed, it’s good to know that the ADI qualification can hold (slightly) broader recognition.
Thank you again, Nick